Fair Trade is Bad for the Poor
February 20th 2010 16:38
Recently, people have become attached to the Fair Trade movement. Why have free trade when trade could be fair? Despite the more appealing title, Fair Trade is not all that it is cracked up to be. From Andrew Chambers:
Though I believe that free trade would provide more benefits to the world's poor than any variation of Fair Trade ever would, this is not an argument against Fair Trade in general. However, it is an argument against the Fair Trade that we have now in practice. To support Fair Trade with our money, it makes no sense to judge the movement based on what it could be in theory. Rather, we need to spend our money based on reality. That reality is not worthy of our financial support. As Fair Trade gains more momentum, economists and concerned citizens need to get the facts and educate the public on the dangers of Fair Trade.
Follow me on Twitter: @AGoldenDoor
Fairtrade provides a minimum baseline price for commodities, allowing farmers to hedge against market volatility. The co-operative system allows small farmers better access to global markets and encourages democratic representation. Each commodity price also includes a "social premium" which can be reinvested in social or development projects.
However, economist Paul Collier argues that Fairtrade effectively ensures that people "get charity as long as they stay producing the crops that have locked them into poverty". Fairtrade reduces the incentive to diversify crop production and encourages the utilisation of resources on marginal land that could be better employed for other produce. The organisation also appears wedded to an image of a notional anti-modernist rural idyll. Farm units must remain small and family run, while modern farming techniques (mechanisation, economies of scale, pesticides, genetic modification etc) are sidelined or even actively discouraged.
Fairtrade director of communications Barbara Cowther admitted in the documentary A Bitter Aftertaste that the organisation had no real policy on mechanisation – this despite the fact that it is central to agricultural development.
By guaranteeing a minimum price, Fairtrade also encourages market oversupply, which depresses global commodity prices. This locks Fairtrade farmers into greater Fairtrade dependency and further impoverishes farmers outside the Fairtrade umbrella. Economist Tyler Cowen describes this as the "parallel exploitation coffee sector".
However, economist Paul Collier argues that Fairtrade effectively ensures that people "get charity as long as they stay producing the crops that have locked them into poverty". Fairtrade reduces the incentive to diversify crop production and encourages the utilisation of resources on marginal land that could be better employed for other produce. The organisation also appears wedded to an image of a notional anti-modernist rural idyll. Farm units must remain small and family run, while modern farming techniques (mechanisation, economies of scale, pesticides, genetic modification etc) are sidelined or even actively discouraged.
Fairtrade director of communications Barbara Cowther admitted in the documentary A Bitter Aftertaste that the organisation had no real policy on mechanisation – this despite the fact that it is central to agricultural development.
By guaranteeing a minimum price, Fairtrade also encourages market oversupply, which depresses global commodity prices. This locks Fairtrade farmers into greater Fairtrade dependency and further impoverishes farmers outside the Fairtrade umbrella. Economist Tyler Cowen describes this as the "parallel exploitation coffee sector".
Follow me on Twitter: @AGoldenDoor
| 35 |
| Vote |
subscribe to this blog













